Pre-Book your MBBS seat now in top medical colleges
Back to Articles

Madras HC Rejects Plea on Sports Quota in MBBS Admission

In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court dismissed a plea by MBBS aspirants seeking horizontal reservation under the sports quota. The court upheld the current reservation policy and emphasized that the sports quota cannot be used to override the established vertical reservation system. This decision reinforces clarity in MBBS admissions for 2025.

2 min read
Madras HC Rejects Plea on Sports Quota in MBBS Admission

The Madras High Court has recently rejected a petition filed by MBBS aspirants demanding horizontal reservation under the sports quota for medical admissions. The plea argued for the inclusion of sports quota candidates across all reservation categories. However, the High Court has firmly stated that the existing system aligns with constitutional norms and does not warrant alteration.


Court Upholds Existing Reservation Policy

The court emphasized that sports quota is currently applied vertically, not horizontally.

The ruling clarifies that candidates cannot claim double benefits under different reservation formats.

This decision aims to prevent dilution of merit-based MBBS admissions.

The plea sought to modify the process for MBBS 2025, which the court found unfeasible.

The court stressed that any change in quota structure should be made only by the legislative or executive bodies, not judicial intervention.


Implications for MBBS Aspirants in 2025

Aspirants applying under the sports quota must adhere to current vertical system rules.

The rejection limits opportunities for sports achievers from reserved categories to compete horizontally.

Candidates must ensure they meet eligibility separately for both quota-based and open category MBBS seats.

The ruling provides stability and clarity for upcoming MBBS 2025 counselling sessions.

It serves as a precedent for future quota-related disputes in medical education.


Understanding Vertical vs. Horizontal Quotas

Vertical reservation refers to broad categories like SC, ST, OBC, and General.

Horizontal reservation, if applied, allows sub-categorization like sports, disability, etc., across all vertical groups.

The plea aimed to treat the sports quota as horizontal, giving broader access.

The court's ruling confirms that sports quota remains confined within its vertical category.

Clear understanding of these terms helps MBBS aspirants navigate counselling better.


Conclusion
With this ruling, the Madras High Court has reinforced the framework of reservation policies in MBBS admissions, ensuring clarity for both institutions and aspirants. For students preparing for MBBS 2025, understanding the distinction between vertical and horizontal quotas is now more essential than ever.